Skip to content

Conversation

@CzyerChen
Copy link
Contributor

Add an agent plugin to support ActiveMQ-Artemis

  • Add a test case for the new plugin, refer to the doc

  • If this pull request closes/resolves/fixes an existing issue, replace the issue number. Closes #11830.

  • Update the CHANGES log.

Comment on lines 18 to 19
2.30.0
2.31.2
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we support more versions? I saw versions in the docs are 2.30 and 2.31 only

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for the testcase depends on spring-boot-3.2.0 and artemis-jakarta-client , it can support

  • not 2.19.0, and 2.19.0before not tested
  • not 2.24.0
  • not 2.25.0
  • 2.26.0
  • 2.27.0
  • 2.28.0
  • not 2.29.0
  • 2.30.0
  • 2.31.x

the version not supprt because of the dependency conflicts with SpringBoot, and springboot-stater-artemis officially support 3 versions of Artemis with jakarta-client (2.26.0,2.28.0,2.31.2)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From you description, I think we should say we support

  • Spring Starter Artemis + ActiveMQ-Artemis a/b/c versions
  • ActiveMQ-Artemis a/b/c/e/f/g versions.

We should have two test scenarios to cover two version lists.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

artemis-jakarta-client has many minor versions, do the support-list.md have to record all the last version number of each minor version.

image

Copy link
Member

@wu-sheng wu-sheng Jan 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

support-list.md should list all the range. support-version.list should pick the latest patch version of every minor for verification. Such as, we could say, we support 2.19 - 2.31, and test 2.19.1 for 2.19.x, 2.23.1 for 2.23.x, 2.31.2 for 2.31.x ...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It can support all artemis-jakarta-client versions from 2.17.0 to 2.31.2 by running the testcase project, but the official docker image apache/activemq-artemis just provide from 2.30.0,. Can I written support 2.17.0 ~ 2.31.2, and test 2.30.0/2.31.2 in support-list.md?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, you can put it that way if you have verified locally or have checked from source codes level.

Suggested change
2.30.0
2.31.2
# You should put comments here about why others are not tested in the plugin test pipeline.
2.30.0
2.31.2

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One more question, Images you provided are server side versions, could you use various client versions to connect 2.31 server?
What we need to verify is only client version compatibility, I believe the server version doesn't matter.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, I can fix the server version, to check the client version.

@wu-sheng wu-sheng added this to the 9.2.0 milestone Jan 26, 2024
@wu-sheng
Copy link
Member

-activemq-artemis-jakata-client-2.x
+activemq-artemis-jakarta-client-2.x

Please notice the name.

@wu-sheng
Copy link
Member

Please fix the javadoc. Warning is fine, notice the error ones, which should be from your codes.

@wu-sheng
Copy link
Member

Is anything wrong for RocketMQ grpc case?

@CzyerChen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is anything wrong for RocketMQ grpc case?

I try to check again.

Copy link
Member

@wu-sheng wu-sheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@wu-sheng wu-sheng merged commit 5cd5265 into apache:main Jan 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants