Skip to content

Conversation

@ctbarbour
Copy link
Contributor

The @NullMarked annotation on DataFetchingEnvironment makes type parameters implicitly non-null, but java-dataloader's DataLoader declares V extends @nullable Object to allow nullable values.

This mismatch prevents Kotlin consumers from expressing nullable value types without unsafe casts when returning CompletableFuture from data fetchers.

Add explicit V extends @nullable Object bound to match DataLoader's type signature, enabling proper nullability propagation to Kotlin.

#4179

The @NullMarked annotation on DataFetchingEnvironment makes type
parameters implicitly non-null, but java-dataloader's DataLoader
declares V extends @nullable Object to allow nullable values.

This mismatch prevents Kotlin consumers from expressing nullable
value types without unsafe casts when returning CompletableFuture
from data fetchers.

Add explicit V extends @nullable Object bound to match DataLoader's
type signature, enabling proper nullability propagation to Kotlin.
Copy link
Member

@bbakerman bbakerman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this.

Moving to JSpecify is an interesting exercise because while it "allows for more precise nullability specifications" its only the Kotlin compiler that truly enforces it.

So this mismatch for example survives a Java compile but not a Kotlin one.

I wonder if we are missing some Java setting that would catch this earlier

@dondonz dondonz merged commit 021fe1b into graphql-java:master Dec 7, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants