-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 388
Add Support for Merge Generator in Postgres v15 #1255
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
|
||
| PostgresColumn column = columns.get(i); | ||
|
|
||
| if (Randomly.getBoolean() && sourceHasColumn(column, sourceTable)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are a couple of repeated code patterns here. It would be great to factor them out to methods.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yep!
| } else { | ||
| sb.append(generateUpdateSet(targetTable, sourceTable)); | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (Exception e) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks a bit surprising. Why does throwing an exception affect the logic of what we generate here? Can we achieve the intended outcome without relying on exceptions?
Closes #1254